Announcements

Good luck on the exam!

18 May 2025

The final exam will be held in-person on Thursday, May 22 from 6:15 to 8:15 p.m. in our normal meeting room.

Please arrive on time. You will only have the two-hour exam period to take the exam.

Exam review sheet and other review materials are posted on the Exams page. Email me with any questions!

Link to Exams page

Welcome to Week 14!

10 May 2025

This week we're going to be talking about the recovery from the Third Century Crisis, which takes the form of a number of new normals including the division of the empire, a new conception of the emperorship known as the Dominate, and the interweaving of Christianity with the Roman political state. How much of the credit for the empire's recovery do you think should go to Diocletian and Constantine? What other factors made it possible for the empire to endure another century and a half in the west and a full millennium in the east after the near-fatal triple calamity of the Third Century? How inevitable was the empire's mutual intrusion with the church?

Finally comes the last stage of the Roman empire in the west, while the eastern empire goes on without it. Given that the empire stabilizes itself in the fourth century, what do you think are the most telling factors in why the western half falls apart so rapidly in the fifth century? Could the Romans have done anything about it?

Now's a good time to think about the Roman idea. What perseveres about the idea of "Romanness" between Romulus and Romulus Augustus? There's something still palpably Roman that runs through this entire 1300-year story. What does Romanness, Romanitas, consist of? What remains consistent and how does it evolve over the long centuries of Roman transformation?

Looking forward to discussing all of this with you. See you Thursday!

Link to Schedule page

Reminder: Review the Essay Musts before posting your papers

10 May 2025

I’ve had a few early submissions ahead of Monday’s deadline, and unfortunately some of these have ignored the basic requirements for papers listed on the Essay Musts page (the fuller title of which is “Requirements for All Papers”).

I am therefore offering a gentle and friendly reminder to everyone that there are indeed such requirements, and that they involve the necessary handling of formatting, structure, and evidence for papers submitted in my courses.

Each of these sections has videos that offer helpful guidance on how to fulfill these requirements.

Link to Essay Musts page

Welcome to Week 13!

3 May 2025

This week we're talking about one of the most dramatic periods of the Roman story: The Third Century Crisis, in which everything goes wrong all at once. What do you think are the most prominent causes of the catastrophe? How related are the economic problems to the military setbacks and the political anarchy? How far back does this go? Are policies, people, or the nature of the principate the culprit?

Looking forward to discussing all of this with you. See you Thursday!

Link to Schedule page

Exam Review Sheet posted

29 April 2025

I’ve updated the final exam page. On this page you’ll find information about the final and some review materials. The exam will take place Thursday, May 22 from 6:15 to 8:15 p.m.

The review sheet is not designed to be a list of answers so much as questions you can use to guide you toward the areas you want to focus on in your review. As you read through the questions on the review sheet, those you have a sense of how you might answer are lower priority for review than those questions you’re not sure how you would answer; those you’d then want to go back and spend some time reviewing in your notes, the readings, the videos, quiz notes, and class discussions.

Also note that the terms are a useful way of finding concepts you need to go back and review, so I’d advise stepping through the terms at the end of each topic and making sure you have a sense of what they mean and why we’re studying them.

To prepare for the essays, I suggest that you focus on what you would consider to be four or five of the major themes of this course, and think about possible questions that relate to those topics across the periods and transitions we’ve explored. For each essay you’ll be asked to give three examples, so you can sketch out a question about a recurring topic in the course, your perspective on that question, and three similar or contrasting examples that demonstrate that perspective.

Please take a look at the review sheet for details on the exam’s content and structure. Once you’ve read through the review sheet, if you have any questions about the exam or about any of the topics covered in it, please don’t hesitate to come to me or bring them up in class.

To get to the final exam page, click on “Exams” in the navigation index, or follow the link to the “Exams page” below.

Link to Exams page

Welcome to Week 12!

27 April 2025

This week we're talking about the period of the Nerva-Antonines—the so-called "five good emperors". It's striking that there's such a term as devised by modern historians. It signifies both something in common in these five men, and a contrast with those who are not part of this series.

What do you think in terms of both points? What kinds of things do they have in common, apart from the praise of later centuries? Are they worthy of that praise? How distinct are they from the Julio-Claudians and the Flavians? How do you see Rome changing critically in this period? You may be aware that true, relentless disaster is coming (the Third Century Crisis)—can we see the groundwork being laid? How has the Roman idea remained constant after eight centuries of constant transformation?

Looking forward to discussing all of this with you. See you Thursday!

Link to Schedule page

Notes and reminders about the Position Paper (due Monday, May 12)

27 April 2025

Here are a few brief reminders about the Position Paper, which is due very soon on Monday, May 12.

Watch the video. Make sure to watch the overview video, since that tells you exactly what I am looking for. It’s on the Position Paper page.

Thesis statement. Make sure you have an introduction with a thesis statement (your argument asserting your position on the question/problem being addressed) and a body that described and discusses three examples from the sources supporting your thesis statement. For models and explanations on how to do this, see the Structure video on the Essay Musts page. Another resource is “Writing a Position Paper” (a.k.a. “The Elephant Pamphlet”), which is on the Resources page.

Sources.

• You must use at least three sources, which can be primary or secondary; tertiary sources (including textbooks and most web pages) are not allowed. See the Evidence video on the Essay Musts page and the Sources page in the Research and Citations Center for more.
• All assertions must be supported by evidence.

Requirements for all papers. You must adhere to the requirements for all papers (listed on the Essay Musts page). Not meeting the requirements for all papers will mean a lower grade.

Template. There is an MS Word template already set up with some of the formatting I require on the Resources page. If you use Word I strongly recommend making use of this template. There is also a Google Docs template.

Late papers. As per the syllabus, late papers are marked down by ten points per class meeting, up to a cap of thirty points. Avoid this penalty and block out the time you need to prepare, write, and review your paper so that it can be submitted on time.

BlackBoard. All essays are uploaded to BlackBoard. Look for “Upload Assignments Here” in the left-hand menu. Your essay needs to be uploaded as a Word (preferred) or PDF file attachment, not pasted in as text submission. If you use a browser-based word processor, download or export to a Word document and upload that.

I’m happy to discuss any aspects of your sources or the paper, so please come to me if there’s anything you’re not sure about. I’m looking forward to hearing your interpretations of your chosen depictions of the ancient Roman world!

Link to Essays page

Welcome to Week 11!

19 April 2025

This week we're talking about the Roman world adjusting to the loss of Augustus. What strikes you as interesting or surprising about the dramatic events of the Julio-Claudians? Why do you think we go from Augustus to Caligula and Nero so quickly? How much of Augustus's plan really survives his death?

Though each princeps defines an era, emphasis on the ruler in Rome does tend to eclipse other things. What's going on in the Roman world during this period that you think should really be drawing our attention?

Looking forward to discussing all of this with you. See you Thursday!

Link to Schedule page

No meeting this week

12 April 2025

Enjoy your break. Email me with any questions about upcoming assignments.

Our next class meeting is the following week. See you then!

Link to Schedule page

Welcome to Week 10!

6 April 2025

This week we're talking about Augustus himself and the principate he created, and there are so many perspectives on him. What makes it possible for Augustus to rule without serious challenge for so long? What exactly is the nature of this rule? What's wrong with it, and what's right about it?

What is the rise of Augustus and the emergence of the principate telling us about the Romans of this time? Discuss your thoughts and questions about Augustus, his role in the Roman story, and all that's going on around him. How different are Augustus the man and Augustus the idea?

Looking forward to discussing all of this with you. See you Thursday!

Link to Schedule page

Welcome to Week 9!

29 March 2025

This week we’re talking about Caesar’s assassination and its aftermath. Why do you think Caesar was really killed? Did the political climate make the failure of the self-styled liberators inevitable, or did they screw up a chance to restore Rome to a pre-Caesar state?

The end of the Republic is still dominated by colorful figures, including that oddest of couples, Antony and Octavian. Antony had the experience, and Octavian was just a kid—so what factors made it possible for him to win out over Antony? How does Cleopatra rate in all of this—pawn or freedom fighter?

I mentioned the end of the Republic, but historians still argue over when the Republic was truly gone. Given what the Romans would have meant by the word, when does the Republic end, do you think? What are the possible turning points after which what’s operating in Rome is no longer the Republic of the previous four-plus centuries?

Looking forward to discussing all of this with you. See you Thursday!

Link to Schedule page

Welcome to Week 8!

23 March 2025

This week we’re experiencing Rome in the wake of the Marius’s bloody coup and Sulla’s equally brutal restoration of the Republic. Some parts of Sulla’s reforms have staying power, but a lot of what Sulla accomplished was rolled back in the decades after his retirement and almost immediate death. What do you think about that? What was Sulla’s most lasting legacy, and why did his reforms start to get unstuck almost from the day he gave up power?

The later stages of the breakdown of the Republic are a breeding ground for fascinating figures. What did Cicero really stand for, do you think? Are there potential justifications for saying Pompey was, in fact, “great”? Was Clodius an iconoclast, an anarchist, an attention-seeker, or a cultural troll? Who else grabs your interest from this turbulent time?

And then: Caesar. Your take, please, on one of the most famous Romans in history. Was he the man Rome needed in 49, when he crossed the Rubicon—to this day a metaphor for there being no turning back? Was his vision for Rome about more than just his own leadership—and if so, what kind of Rome do you think he hoped to create? How was Caesar bad for Rome, even if he had good intentions? And, inevitably: why do you think he was killed?

One more thing to ponder: Sulla and Caesar, though political opposites, had two things in common. Both marched on Rome, and both took hold of the power of the dictatorship to reshape Rome according to their vision. Caesar supposedly said Sulla’s mistake was that he resigned, restoring the Republic to a new normal he had created. Do you agree? Was Sulla naïve to resign, or was Caesar the one who should have stepped down before he was pulled down?

Looking forward to discussing all of this with you. See you Thursday!

Link to Schedule page

Welcome to Week 7!

15 March 2025

This week we start to experience the forces that will break up the Republic, but it will be a long century of turmoil and blood before the Republic is swept aside for the principate.

With the Gracchus brothers, the tensions that have been building in the Republic start to break loose. They were a polarizing factor in their lifetimes and they are just as polarizing now. From the primary sources, the readings, and the lectures, you get multiple perspectives on both brothers. Noble heroes or demagogues? Out to save Rome, or in it for the glory? Or both? What do you think truly drove Tiberius Gracchus, and how was his brother Gaius different or alike? Is their legacy their own doing, or did they happen to be the tribunes that pushed the conservatives over the edge?

And then we have the matched set of Marius and Sulla—who are, if anything, even more divisive today than the Gracchi. Marius the singular arch-populist, and Sulla the strange maverick among the optimates. Both were great generals and compelling leaders… both honestly believed they were saving Rome… and both were ruthless murderers who took Rome by force and massacred all their enemies. Sulla got the bad press because his side lost in the end, so step back and look at their stories objectively. What do you think of them as men, and what do you think of them as Romans? Do either or both earn your respect, and why? What do you think are Marius’s most lasting legacies, and what do you think are Sulla’s?

Looking forward to discussing all of this with you. See you Thursday!

Link to Schedule page

Welcome to Week 6!

9 March 2025

This week, after we finish up with the Punic Wars, we’re talking about the Roman expansion in the East. Did the Romans deliberately set out to create an eastern empire, or did it happen accidentally, as Rome reacted to events in the east? What factors do you think most drive Rome to increase its presence in the east?

We’re also talking about the effects of empire on Rome. What stands out to you as the way Rome is most changed by the acquisition of empire, and would the Romans have seen this as a positive change? What do you think the Romans were most concerned about as they saw the transformation that empire was wreaking on them? Why would they embrace Greek language and culture if they were so proud of being Roman?

Looking forward to discussing all of this with you. See you Thursday!

Link to Schedule page

Reminder: The Proposal is due Monday, March 24

9 March 2025

Here are a few brief reminders about the proposal, which is due very soon on Monday, March 24.

I’m looking for: a problem that can be argued; your proposed thesis; and any other thoughts about what you might want to explore or how you think you might go about supporting your argument in the position paper itself. I’ll give feedback on topic viability, scope, and possible primary and secondary sources.

There is also a video on the course website (see the Essays page or the Videos page) that details exactly what I’m looking for. A sample is also posted on the proposal page. I’m happy to discuss possible ideas and approaches in office hours, after class, or by email.

Here’s what the syllabus has for the proposal assignment.

The assignment: The proposal is just a brief one-page preview of your position paper. It should include:

• The topic you think you’ll want to write about and the problem you’re interested in addressing. You should be able to delineate the problem by describing the opposing views people might take. To make sure you have two clear opposing opinions, you might want to express them in the form “Some say… . Others say….”
• Your preliminary thesis statement—in other words, what you think you might be arguing in your paper.
• Your thesis statement, both here and in the final paper, should be a statement of opinion that someone could disagree with. It can take the form of following up the description of the opposing opinions with your own: “I believe….”
• Remember that your thesis is provisional. You can change anything about your approach and interpretation after the proposal; in fact, uncovering information as you do your research makes refining or changing your initial assessments very likely.

Your proposal is structured like the introduction to your final paper, and may serve as the basis for it.

The proposal is not graded, but whether you submitted a proposal on time will be factored into the final grade for the position paper. I will give you feedback on things like the feasibility of researching your topic, whether the scope is too big or too narrow for a paper like this, and some possible sources you might want to look at.

Link to Proposal page

PDF page updated

26 February 2025

The PDF/Print page has been updated to include all quiz notes PDFs to date and all class meeting slide PDFs to date.

I also fixed a problem on some devices that was causing the submenu font (the buttons under the page picture on the Essays and Citations pages) to display incorrectly.

If you experience any issues with the course website or have suggestions for its improvement, please email me and let me know—I definitely want to hear them!

Link to PDF/Print page

Welcome to Week 5!

23 February 2025

Both the First and Second Punic Wars also seem inevitable in retrospect. Why do you think the Romans really went to war? Did they really want Sicily and Spain, or was something else driving the Romans? Did they seek out these conflicts, or were they just reacting to events?

Both wars were utterly disastrous at first, and yet ended with Roman victories. Did those victories come from Roman success, or Carthaginian failures?

And: How do you think the Rome of 200, after Zama—the actual city, and its citizens milling in the Forum and gathering in its assemblies and in the senate hall—were different from the Rome of two hundred years earlier, before Veii and the Sack?

Looking forward to discussing all of this with you. See you Thursday!

Link to Schedule page

Important notes on the Images Essay (due March 10)

23 February 2025

Here are a few brief reminders about the Images essay, which is due very soon on Monday, March 10.

• Watch the video. Make sure to watch the overview video, since that tells you exactly what I am looking for. It’s on the Images Essay page.
• Thesis statement. Make sure you have an introduction with a thesis statement (your argument asserting your position on the question/problem being addressed) and a body that described and discusses three examples from the sources supporting your thesis statement. For models and explanations on how to do this, see “Writing a Position Paper” (a.k.a. “The Elephant Pamphlet”), which is on the Resources page.
• Sources.
• For the museum option, if you can go to a museum in person and view the works directly that is what I strongly prefer, as this option is about your subjective reactions to experiencing the works you are writing about. Remember to choose two works that have the same subject (two little girls, two warriors, two fertility goddesses) but from different times or places so you can talk about the implications of how the same concept was conveyed differently in different times or places.
• For the film option, you need to write about the agenda of the filmmakers and the agenda of the authors of the primary source and how each is using an ancient culture to impress their own beliefs (the filmmakers’ and the authors’) on the audience. If you’re not sure about the primary sources for the film you chose, make sure to come to me and we’ll discuss.
• Requirements for all papers. You must adhere to the requirements for all papers (listed on the Essay Musts page). Not meeting the requirements for all papers will mean a lower grade.
• Template. There is an MS Word template already set up with some of the formatting I require on the Resources page. If you use Word I strongly recommend making use of this template. There is one for Google Docs as well.
• Late papers. As per the syllabus, late papers are marked down by ten points per class meeting, up to a cap of thirty points. Avoid this penalty and block out the time you need to prepare, write, and review your essay so that it can be submitted on time.
• BlackBoard. All essays are uploaded to BlackBoard. Look for “Upload Assignments Here” in the left-hand menu. Your essay needs to be uploaded as a Word (preferred) or PDF file attachment, not pasted in as text submission. If you use a browser-based word processor, you’ll need to export your paper as a Word document and upload that.

I’m happy to discuss any aspects of your sources or the essay, so please come to me if there’s anything you’re not sure about. I’m looking forward to hearing your interpretations of your chosen depictions of the ancient world!

Link to Essay page

Welcome to Week 4!

15 February 2025

This week we’re taking a closer look at the Rome’s leadership—consuls, dictators, and tribunes, among others. What limited what a consul could do? What about dictators—once they were given total power, what stopped them from taking over Rome and seeking their own glory? How did these leaders relate to the senate and the assemblies?

The early Republic corresponds with the period of the Roman expansion in Italy, leading directly to conquest and empire. It seems like a straightforward progression, with Rome’s dominion getting larger and larger, like a time-lapse video. How is that impression misleading, do you think? What motivates Rome’s expansion, and what has to happen for Rome to gain new territory?

Also, is it all about Rome? What factors in Italy might have made the growth of Rome’s power possible besides Rome’s military strength and adaptability?

Roman historians like to emphasize the Sack of Rome in 390 BCE as turning the Romans toward more aggressive expansion. What do you think? What signs do you see that suggest Rome would have kept on taking more cities after Veii even without the Sack—or would they have settled down into their new and improved city-state on the Tiber and stayed put?

Looking forward to discussing all of this with you. See you Thursday!

Link to Schedule page

Welcome to Week 3!

8 February 2025

This week we’re exploring what replaced the abolition of the monarchy—the Republic. We’ll be looking at the nature of the Republic—opening up the hood and seeing what makes it such an effective and resilient form of government for Rome for nearly five centuries.

One key concern for us this week and in the weeks to come is the factors and values that kept the Republic strong for most of five centuries. What do you think really kept the Republic going, not only well enough to survive but to prosper, expand, and become an empire?

A good way to explore how the Republic worked and how they thought about their relationship with the state is sorting out the officials and systems of the Republic. What seems strangest to you about this set-up? What’s the most impressive to you, and why? What factors do you think aren’t accounted for that might be a problem? When you think about how all of this operates on a day-to-day and year-to-year basis, what do you think is most likely to go wrong?

The most disruptive internal conflict of this time is the Conflict of the Orders. What do you think this struggle was really about? Why do you think it turned out the way that it did?

Perhaps most importantly, there's the primary source you read this week. What did you get out of it? What is this author telling us about Rome, and what idea is he most bent on trying to convince you of? How does this fit with the rest of what we’re discussing this week?

Looking forward to discussing all of this with you. See you Thursday!

Link to Schedule page

Weekly responses start this week

3 February 2025

Each week, in addition to our in-class lecture and discussions, we’ll be having an online discussion in which everyone responds to a reading or some other prompt that relates to the week’s topics. The responses start this week with the Week 2 response.

The weekly responses are a part of your grade, so making a substantive post every week will be part of the routine for this course. (I used to ask these kinds of questions about the readings on the quizzes in class, but this year I opted for shorter quizzes and shifted this discussion to the online responses.)

Responses are due by the Sunday after the class meetings for that week. For example, this week’s responses are due Sunday, February 9. Of course you can make your responses anytime during the week, and I’ll always particularly appreciate responses posted before the class meeting in case there are ideas or questions I want to bring up in class.

To post your response, go to the course website (follow the links sent previously, or find markbwilson dot com and click on Courses), then click on Responses on the side menu or site map.

Once you are on the responses page, read through the prompt and description, then log in. On this page, you log in by choosing your name from the dropdown list of students and entering the last four digits of your emplid as a password. Once you’re logged in you can compose your response post.

Make sure your response is substantial—a paragraph or two of your personal thoughts, ideas, and reasoning. Please try to write in complete sentences so your thoughts are clearer to others. Remember, the environment here is academic, not social media; think of this page as being like a group discussion in class about a subject we’re all trying to explore and give our ideas and perspectives on. Try to add to the discussion with new ideas or a new take on what’s been brought up so far by other students.

I’ve done my best to test this system so that it will work on different browsers and platforms, but there’s always something that can go wrong. Before you submit your response, select the whole text and copy it to your clipboard as a backup. (Or, you can write up your post in a word processing app like Word, then paste your text into the response window.) That way, in the unlikely event that there’s a problem you can email me the post and I can sort out what happened.

Any questions or issues, email me and let me know!

Link to Responses page

Welcome to Week 2!

1 February 2025

This week we're talking about the Roman kings. What's most striking to you about the kings, and how the Romans saw them? Why do you think did their legends described such a ferocious founding king in Romulus—and why did the Romans admire and literally venerate him anyway, placing him among their gods?

What do you think the stories of Tarquin and his son tell us about the Romans? Why are the stories of the Sabine Women and Lucretia so central to a manly culture like the Romans? Setting legend aside, what do you think really made the Romans turn their backs on monarchy?

Also: If you haven’t signed up for your first presentation, please do so now! Go to the sign-up #1 page on the course website and claim one of the remaining readings. Email me with any questions.

Looking forward to discussing all of this with you. See you Thursday!

Link to Schedule page

Welcome to Week 1!

25 January 2025

This is a quick note to welcome you all to the beginning of History of Ancient Rome! I’m looking forward to exploring the Roman world with all of you, starting with our first meeting on Thursday. The meeting is in-person, 6:00 – 8:40 p.m., in Carman 209.

This week we’re exploring core stuff like Roman names, the periods of Roman history, and key themes of the course—all of which is not only material we’ll be relying on regularly throughout the semester, but gives us some really useful insights onto the Roman character. What strikes you as most interesting or unexpected about the Romans? What do you want to know more about?

One thing I like to bring up in the first meeting is how we’re connected to the Romans. What parts of your life link us back to the days when Rome ruled the Mediterranean world—and why was that part of the Roman world so enduring that we still have it with us two thousand years later?

Syllabus and video: As a reminder, the syllabus, assignments, and requirements are all on the course website, which is on my website, markbwilson dot com. Make sure you’ve looked through the site and that you’ve watched the welcome video, which talks about how the course works and answers some common questions.

Books: Also make sure you have the book. The Schultz text will be getting regular use right away, and options for getting it (potentially cheaper) are on the Books page. The reading assignments on the Schedule page of the website are what you need to have read (and thought about) before coming to class.

Email me: Many of you replied back to the welcome-to-the-course email I sent you after you enrolled, confirming that I have a good email address for you. If you didn’t, could you do me a favor and reply back to this one and let me know that I can use this address, or that a different email is better for you? Thanks. I’ll be sending out lots of emails, including weekly previews and information on assignments, so it’s important I’m able to reach you.

Sign up for your presentations: There is a sign-up page on the course website for the two presentations on a primary source you’ll be doing: one in the first half of the semester, and one in the second half. These presentations are just you introducing a reading to the class, along with your take on what the author is trying to say and what you think it means, as a way of kicking off our discussion of that reading.

Get your first sign-up out of the way now and choose a reading that seems interesting to you. To get to the page, click on “Presentations” in the side menu, then “Signup #1”. As always, I'm grateful to those who pick the earlier ones! If you have questions, we’ll talk more about presentations and the rest of the course components at our first meeting.

I’m looking forward to meeting (and remeeting) you all and starting our Roman journey. See you Thursday!

Link to Schedule page

See you soon + email confirmation reminder

21 January 2025

Looking forward to a great semester exploring the story of the Romans with you! Two quick reminders today:

If you haven’t already, please reply back or email me at mark.wilson@lehman.cuny.edu and let me know if this is a good email address for you, or if a different one would be better. I update everyone throughout the semester by email with topics, changes, and assignment info, so making sure I can reach you by email is a priority.

If you haven’t looked over the course website/syllabus, please take a moment and familiarize yourself with the course and the requirements. You can find the course website by going to markbwilson dot com and clicking on Courses. You’ll also need to get the book—info on ways to get it can be found on the Books page on the course website.

I love questions, so please email me with any you have. See you next Thursday!

Sign up for your first presentation!

21 January 2025

Over the course of the semester we’ll be exploring a number of primary source readings—people from the ancient Roman world telling us what it’s like for them. Everyone will have a chance to briefly introduce two of these to the class in order to kick off our discussion of the text and what the reading telling us. One’s on one of the readings from the first half of the semester, and the other is on a reading from the second half.

Go ahead and sign up now for your first presentation. The sign-up page is on the course website (at markbwilson dot com), under Presentations. Look the list over and find one that seems like it might be interesting to spend a little time with when it comes up later in the semester. Each of the titles has a URL link to the reading, so you can get a preview. The dates we’ll be getting to each reading are there, too.

Don’t worry, we’ll talk more in class about the presentations and what goes into them.

If you haven’t watched the welcome video on the home page of the course website, do that first. Feel free to ask me any questions!

Link to Presentation #1 signup page

Welcome to History of Ancient Rome! (Spring 2025)

30 December 2024

Welcome to History of Ancient Rome! I’m looking forward to an interesting semester exploring the cultures and transformations of the ancient Roman world, from its origins as a humble city-state on the fringes of civilization to the fall of the western empire.

Right now, I need you to do three things.

First, look over the course website, which will be our base of operations. Watch the quick welcome and orientation video (linked here and also on the overview page). Look through each of the pages on the website to see how the course will work and how the readings and discussions are set up. Any questions about how it works, please send me an email.

Second, get the books now if you can. A lot of you will be ordering books online, and you need to make sure you have the books and are ready to go when the course starts on January 30. On the “Books” page I’ve tried to give you lots of different options for getting what you need, but consider ordering now if there’s going to be any kind of shipping involved. (If you come across a legitimate online/e-text version of one of the assigned readings that’s not already listed, please let me know.)

Finally, please email me so that I know I have a working email address for you. You can just reply, reply and say “hi”, or reply with a question or concern, but I want to make sure I can contact everyone. If you receive an email from me but there is an email address you prefer I use instead of that one, please definitely reply and tell me that.

Email me anytime with questions at mark.wilson@lehman.cuny.edu. I look forward to starting our Roman journey together.

Link to course website