Ancient Civ.
 

 

Weekly Responses

Post your weekly responses here.

 

Topic: Collapse of the Republic

Due: Sun Dec 8

Prompt: What made Caesar Caesar?

Consider at least one of the following passages about Julius Caesar from ancient authors:

(4) At Rome, moreover, Caesar won a great and brilliant popularity by his eloquence as an advocate, and much good will from the common people for the friendliness of his manners in intercourse with them, since he was ingratiating beyond his years. He had also a large and gradually increasing political influence in consequence of his lavish hospitality and the general splendour of his mode of life. At first his enemies thought this influence would quickly vanish when his expenditures ceased, and therefore suffered it to thrive among the common people; but later on when it had become great and hard to subvert, and aimed directly at a complete revolution in the state, they perceived that no beginnings should be considered too small to be quickly made great by continuance, after contempt of them has left them unobstructed. At all events, the man who is thought to have been the first to see beneath the surface of Caesar’s public policy and to fear it, as one might fear the smiling surface of the sea, and who comprehended the power­ful character hidden beneath his kindly and cheerful exterior, namely Cicero, said that in most of Caesar’s political plans and projects he saw a tyrannical purpose; “On the other hand,” said he, “when I look at his hair, which is arranged with so much nicety, and see him scratching his head with one finger, I cannot think that this man would ever conceive of so great a crime as the overthrow of the Roman constitution.” This, it is true, belongs to a later period.

(5) The first proof of the people’s good will towards him he received when he competed against Caius Popilius for a military tribune­ship and was elected over him; a second and more conspicuous proof he received when, as nephew of Julia the deceased wife of Marius, he pronounced a splendid encomium upon her in the forum, and in her funeral procession ventured to display images of Marius, which were then seen for the first time since the administration of Sulla, because Marius and his friends had been pronounced public enemies. When, namely, some cried out against Caesar for this procedure, the people answered them with loud shouts, received Caesar with applause, and admired him for bringing back after so long a time, as it were from Hades, the honours of Marius into the city. Now, in the case of elderly women, it was ancient Roman usage to pronounce funeral orations over them; but it was not customary in the case of young women, and Caesar was the first to do so when his own wife died. This also brought him much favour, and worked upon the sympathies of the multitude, so that they were fond of him, as a man who was gentle and full of feeling.

(14) Caesar, however, encompassed and protected by the friendship of Crassus and Pompey, entered the canvass for the consul­ship; and as soon as he had been triumphantly elected, along with Calpurnius Bibulus, and had entered upon his office, he proposed laws which were becoming, not for a consul, but for a most radical •tribune of the people; for to gratify the multitude he introduced sundry allotments and distributions of land. In the senate the opposition of men of the better sort gave him the pretext which he had long desired, and crying with loud adjurations that he was driven forth into the popular assembly against his wishes, and was compelled to court its favour by the insolence and obstinacy of the senate, he hastened before it, and stationing Crassus on one side of him and Pompey on the other, he asked them if they approved his laws. They declared that they did approve them, whereupon he urged them to give him their aid against those who threatened to oppose him with swords. They promised him such aid, and Pompey actually added that he would come up against swords with sword and buckler too. At this impulsive and mad speech, unworthy of the high esteem in which Pompey stood and unbecoming to the respect which was due to the senate, the nobility were distressed but the populace were delighted.

(17) Such spirit and ambition Caesar himself created and cultivated in his men, in the first place, because he showed, by his unsparing bestowal of rewards and honours, that he was not amassing wealth from his wars for his own luxury or for any life of ease, but that he treasured it up carefully as a common prize for deeds of valour, and had no greater share in the wealth than he offered to the deserving among his soldiers; and in the second place, by willingly undergoing every danger and refusing no toil. Now, at his love of danger his men were not astonished, knowing his ambition; but that he should undergo toils beyond his body’s apparent powers of endurance amazed them, because he was of a spare habit, had a soft and white skin, suffered from distemper in the head, and was subject to epileptic fits, a trouble which first attacked him, we are told, in Corduba. Nevertheless, he did not make his feeble health an excuse for soft living, but rather his military service a cure for his feeble health, since by wearisome journeys, simple diet, continuously sleeping in the open air, and enduring hardships, he fought off his trouble and kept his body strong against its attacks. Most of his sleep, at least, he got in cars or litters, making his rest conduce to action, and in the day-time he would have himself conveyed to garrisons, cities, or camps, one slave who was accustomed to write from dictation as he travelled sitting by his side, and one soldier standing behind him with a sword. And he drove so rapidly that, on his first journey from Rome to Gaul, he reached the Rhone in seven days.

Horsemanship, moreover, had been easy for him from boyhood; for he was wont to put his hands behind his back and, holding them closely there, to ride his horse at full speed. And in the Gallic campaigns he practised dictating letters on horseback and keeping two scribes at once busy, or, as Oppius says, even more. We are told, moreover, that Caesar was the first to devise intercourse with his friends by letter, since he could not wait for personal interviews on urgent matters owing to the multitude of his occupations and the great size of the city. Of his indifference in regard to his diet the following circumstance also is brought in proof. When the host who was entertaining him in Mediolanum, Valerius Leo, served up asparagus dressed with myrrh instead of olive oil, Caesar ate of it without ado, and rebuked his friends when they showed displeasure. “Surely,” said he, “it were enough not to eat what you don’t like; but he who finds fault with ill-breeding like this is ill-bred himself.” Once, too, upon a journey, he and his followers were driven by a storm into a poor man’s hut, and when he found that it consisted of one room only, and that one barely able to accommodate a single person, he said to his friends that honours must be yielded to the strongest, but necessities to the weakest, and bade Oppius lie down there, while he himself with the rest of his company slept in the porch.

(37) Having ended the [civil] wars, he celebrated five triumphs, four in a single month, but at intervals of a few days, after vanquishing Scipio; and another on defeating Pompey’s sons. The first and most splendid was the Gallic triumph, the next the Alexandrian, then the Pontic, after that the African, and finally the Spanish, each differing from the rest in its equipment and display of spoils. As he rode through the Velabrum on the day of his Gallic triumph, the axle of his chariot broke, and he was all but thrown out; and he mounted the Capitol by torchlight, with forty elephants bearing lamps on his right and his left. In his Pontic triumph he displayed among the show-pieces of the procession and inscription of but three words, “I came, I saw, I conquered,” not indicating the events of the war, as the others did, but the speed with which it was finished.

(38) To each and every foot-soldier of his veteran legions he gave twenty-four thousand sesterces by way of booty, over and above the two thousand apiece which he had paid them at the beginning of the civil strife. He also assigned them lands, but not side by side, to avoid dispossessing any of the former owners. To every man of the people, besides ten pecks of grain and the same number of pounds of oil, he distributed the three hundred sesterces which he had promised at first, and one hundred apiece to boot because of the delay. He also remitted a year’s rent in Rome to tenants who paid two thousand sesterces or less, and in Italy up the five hundred sesterces. He added a banquet and a dole of meat, and after his Spanish victory two dinners; for deeming that the former of these had not been served with a liberality creditable to his generosity, he gave another five days later on a most lavish scale.

(39) He gave entertainments of diverse kinds: a combat of gladiators and also stage-plays in every ward all over the city, performed too by actors of all languages, as well as races in the circus, athletic contests, and a sham sea-fight. In the gladiatorial contest in the Forum Furius Leptinus, a man of praetorian stock, and Quintus Calpenus, a former senator and pleader at the bar, fought to a finish. A Pyrrhic dance was performed by the sons of the princes of Asia and Bithynia. During the plays Decimus Laberius, a Roman knight, acted a farce of his own composition, and having been presented with five hundred thousand sesterces and a gold ring, passed from the stage through the orchestra and took his place in the fourteen rows. For the races the circus was lengthened at either end and a broad canal was dug all about it; then young men of the highest rank drove four-horse and two-horse chariots and rode pairs of horses, vaulting from one to the other. The game called Troy was performed by two troops, of younger and of older boys. Combats with wild beasts were presented on five successive days, and last of all there was a battle between two opposing armies, in which five hundred foot-soldiers, twenty elephants, and thirty horsemen engaged on each side. To make room for this, the goals were taken down and in their place two camps were pitched over against each other. The athletic competitions lasted for three days in a temporary stadium built for the purpose in the region of the Campus Martius. For the naval battle a pool was dug in the lesser Codeta and there was a contest of ships of two, three, and four banks of oars, belonging to the Tyrian and Egyptian fleets, manned by a large force of fighting men. Such a throng flocked to all these shows from every quarter, that many strangers had to lodge in tents pitched in streets or along the roads, and the press was often such that many were crushed to death, including two senators.

(40) Then turning his attention to the reorganisation of the state, he reformed the calendar, which the negligence of the pontiffs had long since so disordered, through their privilege of adding months and days at pleasure, that the harvest festivals did not come in summer nor those of the vintage in the autumn; and he adjusted the year to the sun’s course by making it consist of three hundred and sixty-five days, abolishing the intercalary month, and adding one day every fourth year. Furthermore, that the correct reckoning might begin with the next Kalends of January, he inserted two other months between those of November and December; hence the year in which these arrangements were made was one of fifteen months, including the intercalary month, which belonged to that year according to the former custom.

(45) He is said to have been tall of stature with a fair complexion, shapely limbs, a somewhat full face, and keen black eyes; sound of health, except that toward the end he was subject to sudden fainting fits and to nightmare as well. He was twice attacked by the falling sickness during his campaigns. He was somewhat overnice in the care of his person, being not only carefully trimmed and shaved, but even having superfluous hair plucked out, as some have charged; while his baldness was a disfigurement would troubled him greatly, since he found that it was often the subject of the gibes of his detractors. Because of it he used to comb forward his scanty locks from the crown of his head, and of all the honours voted him by the senate and people there was none which he received or made use of more gladly than the privilege of wearing a laurel wreath at all times. They say, too, that he was remarkable in his dress; that he wore a senator’s tunic with fringed sleeves reaching to the wrist, and always had a belt over it, though rather a loose one; and this, they say, was the occasion of Sulla’s remark, when he often warned the nobles to keep an eye on the ill-girt boy.

[2.143] When [Caesar‘s father-in-law] Piso brought Caesar’s body into the Forum, a huge number of armed men gathered to guard it. It was laid with lavish pomp and cries of mourning on the rostra, whereupon wailing and lamentation arose again for a long time, and the armed men clashed their weapons, and very soon people began to change their minds about the amnesty. Then Marc Antony, seeing their state of mind, did not give up hope. He had been chosen to deliver the funeral oration as a consul for a consul, a friend for a friend, and a kinsman for a kinsman (being related to Caesar through his mother), and so he again pursued his tactic and spoke as follows.

[2.144] “It is not right, my fellow-citizens, for the funeral oration in praise of so great a man to be delivered by me, a single individual, instead of by his whole country. The honors that all of you alike, first Senate and then People, decreed for him in admiration of his qualities when he was still alive, these I shall read aloud and regard my voice as being not mine, but yours.”

He then read them out with a proud and thunderous expression on his face, emphasizing each with his voice and stressing particularly the terms with which they had sanctified him, calling him “sacrosanct”, “inviolate”, “father of his country”, “benefactor”, or “leader”, as they had done in no other case. As he came to each of these Antony turned and made a gesture with his hand towards the body of Caesar, comparing the deed with the word.

He also made a few brief comments on each, with a mixture of pity and indignation. Where the decree said “Father of his country”, he commented “This is a proof of his mercy”, and where it said “Sacrosanct and inviolate” and “Whoever shall take refuge with him shall also be unharmed”, he said “The victim is not some other person seeking refuge with him, but the sacrosanct and inviolate Caesar himself, who did not snatch these honors by force like a despot, indeed did not even ask for them. Evidently we are the most unfree of people because we give such things unasked to those who do not deserve them. But you, my loyal citizens, by showing him such honor at this moment, although he is no more, are defending us against the accusation of having lost our freedom.”

[2.145] And again he read out the oaths, by which they all undertook to protect Caesar and Caesar’s person with all their might, and if anyone should conspire against him, those who failed to defend him were to be accursed. At this point he raised his voice very loud, stretched his hand out towards the Capitol, and said, “O Jupiter, god of our ancestors, and ye other gods, for my own part I am prepared to defend Caesar according to my oath and the terms of the curse I called down on myself, but since it is the view of my equals that what we have decided will be for the best, I pray that it is for the best.”

Noises of protest came from the Senate at this remark, which was very plainly directed at them. Antony calmed them down, saying by way of retractation, “It seems, fellow-citizens, that what has happened is the work not of any man, but of some spirit. We must attend to the present instead of the past, because our future, and indeed our present, is poised on a knife-edge above great dangers and we risk being dragged back into our previous state of civil war, with the complete extinction of our city’s remaining noble families. Let us then conduct this sacrosanct person to join the blest, and sing over him the customary hymn and dirge.”

[2.146] So saying he hitched up his clothing like a man possessed, and girded himself so that he could easily use his hands. He then stood close to the bier as though he were on stage, bending over it and straightening up again, and first of all chanted praise to Caesar as a heavenly deity, raising his hands in witness of Caesar’s divine birth and at the same tune rapidly reciting his campaigns and battles and victories, and the peoples he had brought under his country’s rule, and the spoils he had sent home. He presented each as a marvel and constantly cried “This man alone emerged victorious over all those who did battle with him.”

“And you”, he said, “were also the only man to avenge the violence offered to your country 300 years ago, by bringing to their knees the savage peoples who were the only ones ever to break in to Rome and set fire to it.”

In this inspired frenzy he said much else, altering his voice from clarion-clear to dirge-like, grieving for Caesar as for a friend who had suffered injustice, weeping, and vowing that he desired to give his life for Caesar’s. Then, swept very easily on to passionate emotion, he stripped the clothes from Caesar’s body, raised them on a pole and waved them about, rent as they were by the stabs and befouled with the dictator‘s blood. At this the people, like a chorus, joined him in the most sorrowful lamentation and after this expression of emotion were again filled with anger.

After the speech, other dirges accompanied by singing were chanted over the dead by choirs in the customary Roman manner, and they again recited his achievements and his fate. Somewhere in the lament Caesar himself was supposed to mention by name those of his enemies he had helped, and referring to his murderers said as if in wonder,

To think that I actually saved the lives of these men who were to kill me.

Then the people could stand it no longer. They considered it monstrous that all the murderers, who with the sole exception of Decimus [Junius Brutus] had been taken prisoner as partisans of Pompey, had formed the conspiracy when instead of being punished they had been promoted to magistracies, provincial governorships, and military commands, and that Decimus had even been thought worthy of adoption as Caesar’s son.

[2.147] When the crowd were in this state, and near to violence, someone raised above the bier a wax effigy of Caesar—the body itself, lying on its back on the bier, not being visible. The effigy was turned in every direction, by a mechanical device, and twenty-three wounds could be seen, savagely inflicted on every part of the body and on the face. This sight seemed so pitiful to the people that they could bear it no longer. Howling and lamenting, they surrounded the senate-house, where Caesar had been killed, and burnt it down, and hurried about hunting for the murderers, who had slipped away some time previously.

For your online response this week, write a post that includes the following:

  • Based on what you’ve read, what stands out to you most about Julius Caesar?
  • What part of his story do you find most interesting, surprising, or problematic?
  • What do you think makes Julius Caesar so memorable or remarkable for us thousands of years later?
  • What would you like to find out more about?

Responses for Week 15

Response for Week 15

Amanda Guzman 890
2024-12-10 17:41:33

The most interesting part of this passage is how Caesar had the ability to balance charm and political calculation, especially when he used his popularity and friendliness to create a broad base of support. The passage on caesar’s career early on explained how Caesar's actions such as his hospitality, his ability to ingratiate himself with the common people and his strategic use of public sympathy for example the funeral oration for his wife and Marius helped him gain political influence, despite the initial skepticism from his enemies although they underestimated him and thought his influence would fade once his large spending stopped, Caesar was able to manipulate public sentiment and his careful picking of alliances made his power too strong to be taken down easily.

Appian

Siwani Gurung 888
2024-12-10 17:13:36

  • Based on what you’ve read, what stands out to you most about Julius Caesar? 

I think the intensity of the public's emotional response to his death and Marc Antony's ability to channel that grief into outrage whilst giving the speech to the Senate. The manipulation of symbols creates a dramatic performance as much as a eulogy. I feel this most with the mechanical device used to display Caesar's body.

  • What part of his story do you find most interesting, surprising, or problematic?

The part of his story I find most surprising is how the conspirators seem so oblivious to the volatile reactions the assassination would create (despite their actions being politically motivated), especially with Caesar’s popularity within society. This dissonance between their goals and the public’s reaction makes the events following his assassination feel almost inevitable. 

  • What do you think makes Julius Caesar so memorable or remarkable for us thousands of years later?

Caesar is memorable because not only was he a military genius, he was a controversial figure; his life and death marked the end of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. His story is a dramatic tale of power, loyalty, and most excitingly, betrayal. 

  • What would you like to find out more about?

How did Caesar’s reforms and policies shape Rome? Did they contribute to the assassination?

Response for Week 15

Khadim Gueye 887
2024-12-09 19:28:48

Julius Caesar’s remarkable legacy come from from his ability to combine personal ambition, strategic adaptability, and a deep understanding of power. What stands out most is his resilience in the face of challenges, as Plutarch describes in his early career, where he used his aura and military Skill to rise despite political rivals and debts. The most surprising aspect of his story is his consolidation of power after the civil wars, as noted by Suetonius, which ultimately dismantled the Roman Republic and established him as "dictator for life." This raises enduring questions about the balance between ambition and governance. Caesar remains memorable because he symbolizes both extraordinary achievement and the perils of unchecked authority, with his conquests, reforms, and assassination shaping history. I am particularly curious about the political climate of the late Republic, how societal divisions and systemic weaknesses allowed someone of Caesar’s vision and drive to reshape Rome forever.

Week 15

Gabriel Sarfo Arful 885
2024-12-08 23:39:59

While reading Plutarch's tales of Caesar's prior career, a particular aspect that soared out to me was the way he was portrayed as a man who would never do anything so horrible as overthrowing the Constitution. Roman believes Caesar's plans are completely dictatorial, given the fact that they simply can't imagine such an individual committing something like that. Caesar was admired in the public eye for having the capacity to relate to commoners through discussion. Caesar's perspective on his physical limitations was intriguing. He's essentially portrayed as a young adult whose frail physique was typically unsuitable for combat. However, Caesar might be honored now as a man who had ambitious plans and frequently regarded what worked best for everyone. The tale of him handing his isolated indoor sleeping area to the poorest instead of himself or the most powerful illustrates why people admired and respected him so much. What I would like to find out more about is what kind of education did Caesar acquire, and who were the important mentors that impacted his political and military views?

Week 15 Response

Benjamin Yang 883
2024-12-08 22:24:00

After reading Plutarch’s accounts of Caesar’s early career, the thing about Caesar that stood out to me is how he is described as a man who looked like he would never do something as terrible as overthrowing the constitution. Cicero apparently believes that Caesar’s plans are wholly tyrannical despite saying that he can’t imagine such a face to do something like that. In the public eye, Caesar was held high because of how good he was at relating to the common folk through conversation. An interesting thing about Caesar was his approach to his own physical shortcomings. He’s described basically as a young man whose feeble body was traditionally unfit for warfare. The mindset that his military service would strengthen him rather than faltering to the hardship is also another characteristic that was favored by the Romans. Caesar could be memorable today due to how the man held very noble principles that often considered what was right to everyone. The account of him giving up the only indoor sleeping spot to the weakest rather than himself or the strongest is the epitome of why people liked him so much. I would want to find out if Caesar ever faltered on this moral path or if he ever confided in anyone with how he had many enemies despite having relatively selfless intentions.

Response for Week 15

Marielle Matingou 881
2024-12-08 22:06:54

Appian's account of Caesar's funeral is a vivid and detailed description of the unfolded events. Here's a passage from Appian's "Civil Wars." 

"When Caesar's body was brought into the forum, the multitude, as was natural, was deeply moved. Some called him a demigod, others a hero, and others a king. Antony, who had been appointed to deliver the funeral oration, was so overcome with grief that he could not speak. He merely displayed Caesar's blood-stained toga, and the people, seeing the garment pierced with wounds, were filled with rage and grief.

"The crowd, no longer able to control their emotions, surged forward, seized burning torches, and ran to the houses of Brutus and Cassius, intending to burn them down. But the conspirators had fled, and so the crowd, still burning with rage, set fire to the nearby buildings, and the flames spread rapidly.

"The senators, fearing for their lives, fled in all directions. The people, still raging, spent the rest of the night in violence and rioting. The next day, they gathered in the forum, and, as if inspired by a single spirit, they demanded that Caesar's body be given to them, that they might bury it with the honors due to a hero."

Appian's account highlights the intense emotional response of the Roman people to Caesar's death, as well as their deep affection and reverence for their fallen leader. The passage also underscores the chaos and violence that erupted in the aftermath of Caesar's assassination, setting the stage for the power struggles and conflicts that would shape Rome's future.

Response for Week 15

Thierno Bah 869
2024-12-08 13:20:31

  • Julius Caesar could successfully combine charisma, political power, and marked ambition. He gained people's loyalty according to his charismatic personality and its corresponding public action, such as in the speech at the funeral and the display of the images of Marius. He took the advantage of the general feeling of the people and pushed for some of his progressive policies. He even used the opposition in the Senate to his advantage. Indeed, Caesar was tempered by experience from standing at the head of one of the weightiest of tasks, the tending of loyalty among his men, besides the outstanding industriousness that included handling enormous duties while bodily strength allowed. This kind of talent in combining affability in personal relations with ruthless ambition could allow him to change the political landscape of Rome.
  • Julius Caesar is one of those figures in human history who has a very unique story because he combined personal charm and charisma with his political ambitions. While he was gaining favorable attention from common people because of his easygoing nature and public displays, he was also creating an authoritarian attitude towards Rome, which he tried to implement by abusing the political structure. A duality of character, as expressed in the accessibility of his character versus his unrelenting pursuit of greater authority, begets captivating unpredictability. However, what is perhaps most unnerving concerning his legacy is that such a great deal of charm and accumulation of power resulted in the fall of the Roman Republic, subsequently ushering in the era of imperial rule-a cautionary tale on the dangers of unchecked ambition.
  • Julius Caesar is an important historical figure, taking into consideration the critical roles he played as a leader and his capability to effect reforms in Rome. On record, one of his greatest achievements in military expeditions paved the way for the reorganization of Rome from a republic to an empire. Putting together in Caesar's charisma was someone who, in conjunction with his astute political acumen and great military talent, could nail and maximize both power and influence skillfully using populist methods as against his higher-order ambitions. An example tracing back through history, it has become the stuff of debates about the nature of leadership and attendant risks in concentrated authority, a figure timely in a timeless way in the historical text.
  • I have a general interest in learning more about how the interpersonal relationships, the social connections developed by Julius Caesar, especially with powerful individuals like Pompey, Crassus, and Cleopatra, influenced his rise to power and the decisions that he made has always intrigued me.

What made Caesar Caesar?

Rachid Cherif 868
2024-12-08 10:09:58

The unquenchable ambition of Julius Caesar across a hazy narrative of Gallic wars is what is most puzzling. He wasn’t only an exceptional militarist but also an impressive politician who knew how to win and maintain the goodwill of people as well as outmaneuver political competition. For example, his display of Marius' images at his aunt Julia's funeral shows his ability to take bold symbolic actions to align himself with popular sentiment, even at personal and political risk.

The most surprising part of his story is his discipline and work ethic, particularly considering his physical ailments like epilepsy. His habit of dictating letters on horseback to multiple scribes at once demonstrates an extraordinary ability to multitask and use every moment productively. This determination to overcome his physical limitations through sheer willpower and rigorous discipline is remarkable.

Julius Caesar’s achievements and his personality are clear to makes an indelible mark thousands of years later, because, of the metamorphosing effect that he had on Rome. His quest for power, the changes he made whilst in control, and his role in the establishment of Rome as an empire from a republic are definitive points in time. Furthermore, his reputation for generosity, military genius, and adaptability continues to capture the imagination.

I would like to find out more about how Caesar balanced his relationships with allies like Crassus and Pompey, particularly the eventual breakdown of their alliance. Additionally, his personal life—how he managed his relationships and how his character was perceived by those closest to him—would offer deeper insight into his complexities as a leader and individual.

RE: What made Caesar Caesar?

Thierno Bah 870
2024-12-08 14:37:48

Julius Caesar's rise to power is attributed to his genius militarily, shrewd political calculations, and alliances with key partners. These alliances won for him the important political offices and commands that eventually propelled him into his conquests in Gaul. After Crassus's death, though, the alliance went into disarray, and tensions rose between Caesar and Pompey. This led to a civil war at the end of which Caesar was the sole ruler of Rome. Caesar's personal life, brought into the people's opinion as a result of his affair with Cleopatra, shall help set into perspective that he could even balance personal relationships while at the same time undertaking a political campaign. While admired for his reforms and generosity, his ever-growing control rankled enough Senators to have him assassinated. Caesar was at once an intricately intimate ally of both Crassus and Pompey as well as at odds with them because of his ambitions and leadership qualities.

What made Caesar Caesar?

Shafwan Ibn Majid 862
2024-12-07 20:00:41

Based on what I’ve read, what stands out to me the most about Julius Caesar is he isn’t a lazy, weak leader. For example in “ From Plutarch, on Caesar’s Early Career” paragraph 4 says, “he should undergo toils beyond his body’s apparent powers of endurance amazed them, because he was of a spare habit, had a soft and white skin, suffered from distemper in the head.” This shows he isn’t a weak leader because some part of his body got damaged but his endurance was amazing. For another example in “ From Plutarch, on Caesar’s Early Career” paragraph 4 says, “ Most of his sleep, at least, he got in cars or litters, making his rest conduce to action, and in the day-time he would have himself conveyed to garrisons, cities, or camps.” This shows he isn’t a lazy leader because he sleeps in uncomfortable cars and litter and in his daily life he is constantly moving.

week 15 response

Emily M Ulloa 861
2024-12-07 17:15:54

What strikes me most about Caesar is his combination of bold ambition. From the beginning of his career, as Plutarch shows, he was not content with the ordinary routes to power. His early political moves, such as his role in forming the First Triumvirate with Pompey and Crassus, aimed to circumvent the established political order and build personal alliances that could give him a commanding influence. What is remarkable is his ability to maneuver through the complex, often hostile political environment of Rome using his military genius and his mastery of public relations (such as his use of propaganda through commentaries) to advance his cause. One of the most fascinating aspects of Caesar’s story is his decision to cross the Rubicon in 49 BCE, an act that directly led to the civil war and ultimately his rise to absolute power. The phrase “The die is cast” has come to symbolize a point of no return, and Caesar’s decision to march on Rome signaled a complete break from the Republic’s political structure. Caesar’s memorability lies in his ability to reshape Roman history. He was not only a general but a political visionary who saw the potential for transforming the Roman state. His reforms such as the Julian calendar and his land redistribution policies had long-lasting impacts on the Roman world. Even after his death, his name became synonymous with power ( "Caesar" was the title for later emperors), cementing his place as an iconic figure. I would like to explore more about the political and social dynamics of Caesar's time, especially the way his reforms interacted with the underlying economic and social structures of Rome. How did his policies affect ordinary Romans, and how did the elites respond to his centralization of power? I’m also curious about the psychological and personal dimensions of Caesar's character what drove his overwhelming ambition, and how did he reconcile the tension between his populist persona and his autocratic tendencies?

Week 15 Response

Zuleyaime LaGuerre 852
2024-12-03 21:28:43

While reading about "Caesar’s actions after the Civil Wars", what stood out to me most was how they humanized him but describing moments when he felt self-conscious about his appearance which breaks the facade of a powerful figure to someone who has issues just like everyone else. What was the most interesting however was how while he kept the political structure balanced, he was willing the override traditional structures which could be taken as him wanting what was best for Rome or just wanting control. What makes him so memorable after all their years is how he was able to reform things that were later passed on since then like the calendar and the centralization of power which had left a lasting impact on Roman government and culture. I would like to find out how citizens may have reacted to his reformations and leadership.

Response

Liam McNamara 851
2024-12-03 12:33:16

Based off of all the passages it appears that Caesar was a man who specialized in many useful skills and in fact he possesses many of the same traits that other famed leaders had. One example can be seen in his character, for one he has been stated to be a great talker with him speaking to many of the common folk and with them actually respecting him. Although he was among a different social status he had still talked to those below making him publicly favored. A second example is his military genius which can be seen among the many battles and war campaigns of which he won, he was a highly decorated general and he was very tactical which had led him to his victories. The third example is his intellect as although he is commonly remembered for his militaristic and political victories he is also quite smart as to achieve all this he had to do much work and he was known for not giving up. Another very important aspect was his fearlessness, he could not be threatened or swayed. In turn this also affected everything else with his politics being not the same as others in his position. All around he was a man who did as he pleased although he was well mannered he didn't let anything stop him. What I find interesting was up until his later years he was always held and talked about with high regards up until recently before his death which was when many began to feel differently. People had begun to see him as corrupt when previously he was seen as the most trusted even by the lower class. What makes him remarkable to this day is his story as although he was not the worst off he had taken every opportunity to get to his where he was, he had to build up to that point with much hard work rather than the kings and Queens who inherit a crown. I would like to know more about his connection to the people.